Comments on: PR: Proportional Representation or Political Ransom? http://petertate.com/randomthoughts/pr-proportional-representation-or-political-ransome/#utm_source=feed&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=feed Its the thought that counts Tue, 14 Dec 2010 11:28:19 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: Peter http://petertate.com/randomthoughts/pr-proportional-representation-or-political-ransome/comment-page-1/#comment-112 Peter Tue, 11 May 2010 19:34:02 +0000 http://petertate.com/?p=123#comment-112 The figures are modelled but with proper statistical rigour. The details are on the <a href="http://www.electoral-reform.org.uk/blog/?p=36" rel="nofollow">ERS site</a> in their blog post from today. The figures are modelled but with proper statistical rigour. The details are on the ERS site in their blog post from today.

]]> By: Carolyn Phillips http://petertate.com/randomthoughts/pr-proportional-representation-or-political-ransome/comment-page-1/#comment-111 Carolyn Phillips Tue, 11 May 2010 18:52:19 +0000 http://petertate.com/?p=123#comment-111 I agree we need electoral reform now, and that the Liberals are the only party progressive enough to really want it. I am confused however by the figures shown here. How can we know the possible results of AV or STV since we do not know how people would have ranked the candidates they didn't choose. I agree we need electoral reform now, and that the Liberals are the only party progressive enough to really want it.

I am confused however by the figures shown here. How can we know the possible results of AV or STV since we do not know how people would have ranked the candidates they didn’t choose.

]]>